Skip to content
🇭🇹   BETA  ·  Istwanou is free during beta — free access continues until January 1, 2027 or when we reach 100,000 entries, whichever comes first.  ·  4,236 entries published  ·  95,764 entries away from the 100k milestone.       🇭🇹   BETA  ·  Istwanou is free during beta — free access continues until January 1, 2027 or when we reach 100,000 entries, whichever comes first.  ·  4,236 entries published  ·  95,764 entries away from the 100k milestone.       
You are offline — some content may not be available
261

Article 261

Des sentences, jugemens et arrêts

Criminal Procedure
Titre II: De la procédure criminelle (On Criminal Procedure)
Chapitre X: Des sentences, jugemens et arrêts (On Sentences, Judgments, and Decrees)

L'avis le plus doux passera pour les jugemens, soit d'instructions ou définitifs ; si le plus sévère ne prévaut d'une voix, dans les procès jugés à charge d'appel, et de deux dans ceux jugés en dernier ressort.

Life lesson: In criminal cases, the lenient view wins unless the harsher verdict carries by at least one extra vote at trial level, or two extra votes at the final appellate level — doubt favors mercy.
Notes: Pro reo voting rule: avis le plus doux prevails by default. Override: +1 vote margin for à charge d'appel cases; +2 votes for dernier ressort. Structural bias toward leniency. Requires supermajority for severity at final appeal. Remarkable pro-defendant procedural safeguard.
Share this article