Skip to content
🇭🇹   BETA  ·  Istwanou is free during beta — free access continues until January 1, 2027 or when we reach 100,000 entries, whichever comes first.  ·  4,236 entries published  ·  95,764 entries away from the 100k milestone.       🇭🇹   BETA  ·  Istwanou is free during beta — free access continues until January 1, 2027 or when we reach 100,000 entries, whichever comes first.  ·  4,236 entries published  ·  95,764 entries away from the 100k milestone.       
You are offline — some content may not be available
9000 BCE

9000 BCE: (Nilo-Saharan Monotheism — A Different Kind of Monotheistic Conception Among Nilo-Saharan Speakers from as Early as the Proto-Northern Sudanic Era …

African

9000 BCE: (Nilo-Saharan Monotheism — A Different Kind of Monotheistic Conception Among Nilo-Saharan Speakers from as Early as the Proto-Northern Sudanic Era of Around the Ninth Millennium BCE, a Belief in a Monotheistic Entity Better Described Perhaps Not as a Discrete Deity but as a Pervasive Divine Force, Representing a Second Independent African Invention of Monotheistic Thought Thousands of Years Before Comparable Ideas Emerged in the Middle East): The Nilo-Saharan speakers from as early as the proto-Northern Sudanic era of around the ninth millennium BCE believed in a different kind of monotheistic entity — one better described perhaps not as a discrete deity but as something else, a conception that Ehret will elaborate in the pages that follow. What is already clear from this initial framing is that the Nilo-Saharan conception of monotheism was structurally different from the Niger-Congo conception — not a personalized Creator God but a different kind of divine unity, a distinct theological architecture arising from a separate intellectual tradition. Two African language families, two independent monotheistic traditions, two entirely different ways of conceiving the relationship between the divine and the human — both of them predating Middle Eastern monotheism by thousands of years. The Niger-Congo tradition produced a Creator God, a divine Person who initiated existence. The Nilo-Saharan tradition produced something more diffuse, more pervasive, less personalized. Together they demonstrate that the human capacity for monotheistic thought is not a gift from a single cultural tradition but a recurring achievement of the human mind, arising independently in multiple contexts — and arising earliest, as far as the evidence can tell us, in Africa. The theologians and philosophers of the Western tradition who have spent centuries debating the origins and nature of monotheism have been conducting their inquiry with most of the evidence locked outside the room. Africa holds the oldest keys, and they open doors that the Western conversation has not yet imagined.

Source HT-EHAA-000438