Skip to content
🇭🇹   BETA  ·  Istwanou is free during beta — free access continues until January 1, 2027 or when we reach 100,000 entries, whichever comes first.  ·  4,236 entries published  ·  95,764 entries away from the 100k milestone.       🇭🇹   BETA  ·  Istwanou is free during beta — free access continues until January 1, 2027 or when we reach 100,000 entries, whichever comes first.  ·  4,236 entries published  ·  95,764 entries away from the 100k milestone.       
You are offline — some content may not be available

1816, Jan.

HT-HAPA-1816-000216

1816, Jan. 1 (The Hypocrisy of Pétion’s Public Speeches): The Northern government asserted that Pétion’s recent public declarations against the French were a “vile mask” intended to hide his true intentions. They argued that Pétion only spoke of independence when he felt his popularity was failing or when his “intrigues” with French agents were on the verge of being exposed. The narrative claims that Pétion had a natural “repugnance” for the word independence and only used it when forced by “imperious circumstances.” This critique was meant to characterize the Southern leader as a “monster” of duplicity who would eventually abandon his followers when affairs became desperate. Such attacks were designed to weaken Pétion’s support among the military and the common citizens of the South.

Source  ·  HT-HAPA-1816-000216  ·  p. 195 Sanders, Haytian Papers, 195 / Bates: HT-HAPA-1816-000216