Skip to content
🇭🇹   BETA  ·  Istwanou is free during beta — free access continues until January 1, 2027 or when we reach 100,000 entries, whichever comes first.  ·  4,236 entries published  ·  95,764 entries away from the 100k milestone.       🇭🇹   BETA  ·  Istwanou is free during beta — free access continues until January 1, 2027 or when we reach 100,000 entries, whichever comes first.  ·  4,236 entries published  ·  95,764 entries away from the 100k milestone.       
You are offline — some content may not be available
15,000 BCE–3100 BCE

15,000 BCE–3100 BCE: (The Chapter 5 Summation — Two Deep-Time Stories of the Africanity of Ancient Egypt, the First Tracking Key Deep Roots of Egyptian Cultu…

African

15,000 BCE–3100 BCE: (The Chapter 5 Summation — Two Deep-Time Stories of the Africanity of Ancient Egypt, the First Tracking Key Deep Roots of Egyptian Culture and Economy Back Seventeen Thousand Years to the Horn of Africa, the Second Describing How Political and Ritual Ideas and Institutions Took Shape Within the Multiethnic Middle Nile Culture Area of the Sixth Through Fourth Millennia BCE Encompassing Both Nilo-Saharan and Early Egyptian Speakers, the Shared Features More Often Than Not Originating Among the Nilo-Saharans, Ancient Egypt’s Africanity Much More Than Geographical — Its African Cultural and Political Roots Were Primary and Foundational): In sum, there are two deep-time stories to relate about the Africanity of ancient Egypt. The first tracks several of the key deep roots of Egyptian culture and economy back seventeen thousand or more years ago to lands farther south, in the Horn of Africa. The second describes how the political and ritual ideas and institutions of the ancient Egyptian state and its society took shape within a wider multiethnic sphere of cultural interaction and convergence — the Middle Nile Culture Area of the sixth through fourth millennia BCE — a cultural world encompassing both speakers of Nilo-Saharan languages and speakers of early forms of ancient Egyptian. It now appears that, more often than not, the shared features of this common cultural sphere had their origins among those Nilo-Saharans. And then the closing declaration, delivered with the force of a conclusion that seventeen thousand years of evidence have made inescapable: ancient Egypt’s Africanity was much more than just geographical. Its African cultural and political roots were primary and foundational. Not secondary. Not incidental. Not a matter of geography alone. Primary and foundational. The language came from the Horn of Africa. The grain-harvesting economy came from the Horn of Africa. The word for god came from proto-Erythraic. The henotheistic religion came from proto-Afrasian. The ceramic styles came from Sudan. The burial practices came from Sudan. The maceheads came from Sudan. The astronomical knowledge came from Nabta Playa. The sacral kingship came from the Nilo-Saharan south. The royal iconography was co-created with Nubian rulers at Qustul. The retainer burial was a Nilo-Saharan institution. The White Crown was first worn by a Nubian king. Every foundation stone of ancient Egyptian civilization was quarried in Africa, shaped by African hands, and laid by African peoples. Ancient Egypt was not merely in Africa. It was of Africa. And the two centuries of Western scholarship that pretended otherwise were not merely wrong. They were an act of erasure so comprehensive that it constituted one of the great intellectual crimes of the modern era. Ehret has reversed that erasure. The evidence is now on the table. And the evidence says: Africa.

Source HT-EHAA-000367, HT-EHAA-000368